Fixing the formula

Fixing the extra events

If we view the whole predicted event space, we see that the extra predicted events can also be modeled with a triangle number, as seen in the illustration below

Crosssection when the sum is 10

Acknowledging this we can adjust the formula to respect the impossible events.

\[p_n = \dfrac {n(n+1)}{2} - 3{\begin{cases} 0, & \text{for}\; n \le 6 \\ {\dfrac {(n-6)(n-5)}{2}}, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}}\]

Going further, we then notice that we are undercounting the green dots are subtracted twice, while they were added once.

Crosssection when the sum is 14

Thus we can once again amend our formula.

\[p_n = \dfrac {n(n+1)}{2} - 3{\begin{cases} 0, & \text{for}\; n \le 6 \\ {\dfrac {(n-6)(n-5)}{2}}, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}} + 3{\begin{cases} 0, & \text{for}\; n \le 12 \\ {\dfrac {(n-12)(n-11)}{2}}, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}}\]

Checking the formula even outside the upper bounds, we find that it should give 0:

Crosssection when the sum is 19

Going even further we find that it dips in the negative: \(n_{19} = -3\)

Crosssection when the sum is 21

Thus we amend our formula for the last time:

\[p_n = \dfrac {n(n+1)}{2} - 3{\begin{cases} 0, & \text{for}\; n \le 6 \\ {\dfrac {(n-6)(n-5)}{2}}, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}} \\ + 3{\begin{cases} 0, & \text{for}\; n \le 12 \\ {\dfrac {(n-12)(n-11)}{2}}, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}} - {\begin{cases} 0, & \text{for}\; n \le 18 \\ {\dfrac {(n-18)(n-17)}{2}}, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}}\]

Well, we will change the formula once still, but the values it provides are final.

previous | next